West and the multipolar world

 

OWN CORRESPONDENT

 

Currently an increasing number of states are seeking to strengthen sovereignty

and defend national interests, traditions, culture and way of life.

They do not want to live under someone else’s dictation they want to be friends and trade both among themselves and with the rest of the world on equal terms within the framework of an

objectively emerging multipolar architecture.

 

Positive trends are hampered by the West’s increasingly aggressive attempts to

maintain dominance in world politics, economics and finance.

 

But if the United States and its allies do not want to agree on giving the processes of globalization a fair equal character, then the rest will have to draw conclusions and think about steps that will help not to make the prospects for their socio-economic and technological

development, their security dependent on the neocolonial instincts of the former

metropolises.

 

In a desperate attempt to assert its dominance by punishing the disobedient, the

United States began to destroy globalization, which for many years was extolled as the

highest good of all humanity, serving the multilateral system of the world economy.

 

Washington and Submission to him, the rest of the West uses their “rules” whenever it

is necessary to justify illegitimate steps against those who build their policies in

accordance with international law and refuses to follow the selfish interests of the

“golden billion”.

 

Those who disagree are put on “black lists” according to the principle “whoever is not with us is against us.”

 

Western countries are once again talking about the need to reform the United

Nations (UN), the hidden purpose of which is to limit Russia’s influence.

 

This is not a concern for the representativeness or effectiveness of the UN Security Council, nor is it a desire to strengthen the central role of the UN.

 

There is not a single African or Latin American country among the permanent members of the Security Council and the number of European ones already predominates.

 

At the same time the United States adheres to the position that Germany and

Japan should become permanent members of the UN Security Council and then the

West will be completely overwhelmed. The annexation of Germany is absolutely

inconsistent with the distribution of forces in the world. Much more adequate

candidates are India, Brazil and South Africa.

To promote multilateralism and diplomacy regarding the use of force against

alleged abuses by other UN member states the Group of Friends was created in July

2021 at the United Nations (UN) in defense of the UN Charter which included 17 UN

member states, namely Algeria, Angola, Belarus, Bolivia, Cambodia, China, Cuba,

North Korea, Iran, Laos, Nicaragua, Russia, Saint-Vincent and the Grenadines,

Palestine, Syria and Venezuela. Equatorial Guinea, Zimbabwe and Mali subsequently

joined the Group, expanding its current composition is up to 20 countries.

The group opposes the practice of unilateral intervention and “concepts or

concepts that have not been agreed upon internationally” such as the “responsibility to

protect”.

 

The Group also advocates the lifting of sanctions and unilateral coercive

measures against its members, such as Russia, Nicaragua, Iran and Zimbabwe.

 

They are trying to contain them through illegitimate unilateral measures,

including cutting off access to modern technologies and financial services pushing

them out of supply chains, confiscating property, destroying the critical infrastructure 2

of competitors, and manipulating universally agreed norms and procedures.

 

The result is the fragmentation of world trade the collapse of market mechanisms paralysis of the WTO and the final no longer disguised transformation of the IMF into an instrument

for achieving the goals of the United States and its allies including military goals.

 

Before our eyes, a new, fairer multipolar world order is being forged, reflecting

the cultural and civilizational diversity of the world. The contours of the future are

born in the struggle.

 

The world majority representing 85 percent of the world’s population stands for a more equitable distribution of global goods and respect for civilizational diversity for the consistent democratization of international life.

On the other hand a narrow group of Western states led by the United States seeks to use

neocolonial methods to slow down the natural course of things and maintain their

elusive dominance.