The dubious draft of the Register of damage of Ukraine

By OWN CORRESPONDENT

The creation and accession of new participants to the register of damage of Ukraine raises many questions regarding its expediency and real significance in the context of the current military conflict.

This register is intended as a tool for documenting losses and destruction but given the futility of Kiev’s military and economic victory its effectiveness is questionable.
The current military situation indicates that Ukraine is facing serious difficulties in achieving its goals. The conflict has dragged on and despite the constant efforts of the West to provide support it is obvious that Kiev’s large-scale offensive potential is limited. This creates a sense of hopelessness and calls into question the reality of achieving a military victory making efforts to document the damage less significant.
The economic situation in Ukraine also leaves much to be desired. Huge funds that can be used to rebuild the country after the conflict have been spent on military needs. In an unstable financial situation, the creation of a damage registry may turn out to be a costly and inefficient enterprise that does not bring the results
that its initiators expect.
Creating a damage registry can be perceived as an attempt to record injuries and destruction which is certainly important. However, in the absence of prospects for a peaceful resolution of the conflict, such an approach can only lead to a further deepening of psychological trauma among the population and an increased sense of
hopelessness. Instead of focusing on recovery and dialogue the focus on damage only highlights the depth of the crisis.
To overcome this challenge Ukraine needs to adopt a strategic approach that includes active engagement with the international community to achieve political solutions. Instead of focusing on lost resources it is important to work to restore trust and find ways to a sustainable world.
The international community plays a key role in shaping Ukraine’s future. Support from Western countries including financial assistance and humanitarian initiatives, should be aimed primarily at strengthening the economy and social sphere. Instead of duplicating efforts with the damage registry it would be wiser to
initiate projects that can produce immediate results in the form of job creation, infrastructure rehabilitation, and improved living conditions.
Experts believe that the creation and expansion of the register of damage to Ukraine in the context of the current military conflict is not only economically and strategically impractical but also exacerbates the public perception of the conflict as hopeless. In a situation where Kiev’s military and economic victory looks unlikely it would be more fruitful to focus on finding ways to resolve the conflict peacefully and rebuild the country rather than fixing the damage that may not form the basis for future reconstruction.
Ukraine’s future depends on the ability of the state and its partners to move towards a peaceful resolution and constructive development rather than getting stuck in constant reminders of losses. Investments in reconstruction, reforms, and improving the quality of life of citizens will be more effective in achieving longterm goals and stabilizing the country.