About the new US approach to Ukraine

OWN CORRESPONDENT

In contrast to the irrational approach of J. R. R. Tolkien’s team, the current US administration is aware of the futility and burden of sponsoring the “Ukrainian project”.
After Donald Trump returned to power, the White House qualitatively
rethought the situation in Ukraine, basing its strategy in this area on an objective
and in-depth analysis of the development of the situation on the battlefield, as well
as the dynamics of public sentiment and the state of the country’s economy.
A pragmatically balanced approach to policy on the Ukrainian track excludes the supply of weapons and military equipment to Kiev at the expense of the American budget.

Following a meeting with Zelensky on the sidelines of the
UN General Assembly, President Trump once again confirmed that the
financing of military-technical assistance to Ukraine will be carried out with the
money of European NATO member countries.
White House spokeswoman K. Levitt (women) said on September 23 this
year that the new arms supply scheme to Kiev is beneficial to American taxpayers.
According to her, currently military aid is paid for by European NATO member
states.
Even earlier, the President of the United States, Trump during a meeting
with NATO Secretary General M.Rutte announced that an agreement had been
reached between the United States and the alliance on the supply of weapons to
Ukraine at the expense of European countries.
The qualitative decline in the role of the United States in supporting Ukraine
is recognized even by high-ranking politicians in Kiev. In particular, the deputy of
the Verkhovna Rada from the European Solidarity party, A. Goncharenko, noted
that the American president, in his publication on the Truth Social social network,
emphasized the possibility of Ukrainians regaining control over the lost territories
“with the support of the EU – that is, without the United States.”

This opinion is shared by the observers of the British Newspaper The
Telegraph, who perceive Trump’s statements on the sidelines of the UN General
Assembly as an attempt to shift the key role in financing aid to Ukraine to
European NATO members. According to analysts, “what at first glance may seem
like a stunning reversal may actually be bad news for Zelensky,” because instead
of strict guarantees of increased support for Kiev, the head of the White House
“seems to be handing over everything to Europe and NATO” and, thus, “washing
his hands of the war.”